Original title: North American Observation丨The Supreme Court’s nomination by Justice Trump has been confirmed as “out of balance” by the Supreme Court
local time October 26 Late in the evening, the U.S. Senate voted 52 to 48 to confirm Amy Corny Barrett as Justice of the Federal Supreme Court to fill the vacancy left by the death of liberal Justice Ginsberg. As the fifth female justice in the history of the United States, the arrival of Barrett is expected to further reshape the structure of the Federal Supreme Court, allowing the court to be dominated by conservatives for a longer period of time, which may affect the judgment of the next few decades. From a long-term perspective, if the Supreme Court’s position is seriously unbalanced, it may face more disputes over its rulings, further tearing apart the already “polarized” American society.
△Amy Kone Barrett
The Republican Party strongly pushes “Quick Confirmation”
The Senate confirmed Barrett’s nomination with a 52-48 vote on the evening of October 26. She will become the 115th Supreme Court justice, the fifth female justice and the youngest in the history of the United States. The justices. In this way, the Supreme Court will be composed of six conservatives and three liberal justices, and conservatives are expected to dominate the Supreme Court for a long time.
All Democrats in the Senate voted against Barrett’s confirmation. Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, also voted against it, believing that it is so close to 11 In the case of general election day on the 3rd, the hastily confirmation of the candidate for justice was out of date. But in the face of the majority party status of the Republican Party, they could not stop the appointment.
The Republican-controlled Senate voted 51 to 48 on the afternoon of the 25th. It voted to limit the debate on the nomination, which was the final on the evening of the 26th. The vote paved the way. As the Republicans in the Senate occupied a 53-47 majority, and there was no sign that more than three Republicans would “reverse”, it was determined at that time that Barrett would successfully win the majority left after Ginsberg’s death. The tenure of the judge.
Bloomberg analyzed that only 38 days after the death of Ginsberg, regarded as a progressive female icon in the United States and a pioneer in fighting for women’s legal rights and a leading liberal figure, U.S. President Trump and his Republican allies in the Senate have promoted the “quick confirmation” of Barrett, hoping that she will be in place quickly to avoid once this year’s election results depend on the Supreme Court’s ruling as it did in 2000. It was deadlocked.
Of course, this is also a good opportunity for Trump and Republicans to make the Supreme Court as a whole “rightward” before the election. Jonathan Trey, a professor of law at George Washington University, believes that judge Barrett’s records on gun rights and immigration cases, and how left Ginsberg has voted in the past, will Barrett’s vote in the Supreme Court. right.
Barrett, 48, was born in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. He previously served as a judge on the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and currently lives with her husband Jesse South Bend, Annan State, Indonesia. Her husband was previously a federal prosecutor and currently works for a private company. The couple have 7 children, two of whom are adopted from Haiti.
Barrett served as an assistant to the late Justice Scalia. She once commented on Scalia as the “most staunch conservative send”. Like her spiritual mentor Scalia, Barrett is also a fundamentalist in legal concepts. Fundamentalism believes that when judges interpret the words and sentences in the constitution, they need to start with the original intent of the original authors when they created the constitution. Many liberals oppose this strict approach, and they emphasize the importance of keeping up with the times.
However, during the Senate hearing, Barrett tried to downplay the perception of her party or personal views. She said: “The judge must be written in accordance with the law The form of writing, rather than applying the law in the form that judges want the law to be written.” She also stated that “policy decisions and values judgments” should be made by elected politicians, not judges of the Supreme Court. But few Democrats believe that she will deviate from her usual conservative position while working on the Supreme Court.
△ Bloomberg reported that the Senate confirmed Barrett as the Supreme Court Justice of the United States
Kingsberg died in September this year, Trump immediately announced that he would name a new justice to replace her vacancy before the November election, the Democratic Party People criticized that Kingsberg’s vacancy should be nominated and filled by a new president after the election. In this case, Barrett’s “quick confirmation” is extremely controversial and full of party ambitions.
Former President Obama faced a similar situation in 2016: conservative Justice Scalia died in February of that year, less than a year after the election. He was An attempt was made to nominate Garland, then Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for the District of Columbia, to fill the vacancy in Scalia, but was criticized by Republicans on the grounds that the vacancy should be filled by the new president.
The Senate at the time was controlled by the Republican Party. Majority leader McConnell refused to hold a hearing for Garland’s nomination, accusing Obama of not being nominated in the presidential election year The Senate did not process Garland’s nomination in the end. After Trump was elected president, Gorsuch nominated to fill the vacancy in Scalia, who took office in April 2017.
△ The “Politician” poll shows that only 37% of people believe that Trump should be the Appoint a justice before the general election
Barrett graduated from Notre Dame Law School , Was an assistant to the late conservative Supreme Court Justice Scalia. After Ginsberg’s death, she was the only candidate for Trump’s “interview”, and Trump had high hopes.
analysis believes that Trump’s choice to nominate Barrett may bring a series of political benefits: First of all, Ginsberg is regarded as an icon of American progressive women “Now Trump nominates a female justice. Even if the two have different positions, it still makes sense to some voters. Secondly, Barrett has a series of issues such as abortion, medical insurance, gun control, and immigration. A conservative stance, welcomed by American social conservatives and religious rightists, can stabilize the fundamentals of the Republican Party; in addition, Barrett is a devout Catholic, and Catholics are an important group of voters in key swing states such as Pennsylvania. Nominate her May help Trump win more support.
Author:SINA,If you need to reprint,please indicate the source:http://www.todaycamera.com/camera-news/nomination-of-justice-trump-is-confirmed